Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
About Deviant DanteMale/Vatican City Recent Activity
Deviant for 8 Years
Needs Core Membership
Statistics 0 Deviations 1,736 Comments 4,639 Pageviews
×

Critiques


The mountain in the background is not only in a different style, but also very mundane, not evocative of an alien world. And then, in t...


Oh, sit down, previous reviewer. All the poinys made r fair and accurate, but the rating IS FUCKIN ASS. Whats the vision? Its sex. So i...


They say those who draw, or whatever, r still needed, cuz photography cant solve the problem of capturing the thing, that doesnt exist....


at step 2 uve done sth to her mouth, that made her change her expression from "resting" to "ewww, im tying up my hair". There seems to ...

Newest Deviations

No deviations yet

Favourites

Lords of Nether: Belial :icondezilon:Dezilon 94 3 Melkor :iconfrerinhagsolb:FrerinHagsolb 306 77 The Bloodhound :iconsebastianwagner:SebastianWagner 154 23 Secret Passage :iconskoldart:SkoldArt 62 4 Skull :icontomstrzal:Tomstrzal 80 2 Skull :icontomstrzal:Tomstrzal 80 1 The Sanctuary :iconhydraw-art:Hydraw-Art 94 9 Blood Cells :iconcriogenreptyle:CriogenReptyle 44 9 Spaceship_concept :iconivanlaliashvili:IvanLaliashvili 363 10 We Have Contact :iconjbrown67:jbrown67 69 3 Tkarite Hall of Judgment :iconseekhim:SeekHim 24 31 Demon Lancer :icontsaber:TSABER 151 10 Legion of the Fallen -Undivine Sentry :icontsaber:TSABER 178 11 Grave Encounter :iconartofbeng:ArtOfBenG 188 10 Ascended Kings: Dire Revenant :icondylanpierpont:DylanPierpont 314 16 We are no longer alone :iconcolourbrand:Colourbrand 145 122

Activity


The mountain in the background is not only in a different style, but also very mundane, not evocative of an alien world. And then, in the center, theres this construction. Is that alien? HArdly. Not only did a kuman came up with it, but also humans prove very diverse in their ideas of style. Its like this problem, where game designs go "we made this race have this kind of buildings look, while this race has their buildings looking like that" - maybe a part of visual language, but have u seen the variety of architectural styles just on earth? Just in a different city?
The whole scene looks like either a sandstorm, any storm or smoke after crashing a space vessel, lets say. Any of the mentioned hardly specific to alien world.
Maybe it looks pleasing, overall, but hardly representative of the title
Oh, sit down, previous reviewer. All the poinys made r fair and accurate, but the rating IS FUCKIN ASS. Whats the vision? Its sex. So immediately its also not original. Impact is as much as sex, but since its just sex and non-original at that, its low.
How the fuck can u live like that? U come here, point out all the errors and give it 5/5 anyway.
Shit fingers
Small ass
Sex
Blur of hair and background
Sex
10 / 10, participation award, gj, u tried, go back to the drawing board, look at fingers more, look at asses more.
Everything else is fine.
They say those who draw, or whatever, r still needed, cuz photography cant solve the problem of capturing the thing, that doesnt exist. So in essence whatever is drawn, or painted is unrealistic. But we all know there r different qualities or lvls of unrealism. Like theres surrealism, which is a well done mess, theres just an approach of representing sth, that wasnt yet captured faithfully with recording media and theres this "artists randition of", where it can eother stick to whats real and illustrate a speculation, or put on "paper" what the artist thinks is right. Problem is u spent time on drawing, not on science, so everything u draw is utterly impossible, on top of generally looking pleasant and being well-done.
Supposedly the character is on a planet similar to Earth, cuz i dont see any distinctive breathing apparatus. There r clouds, sky has a color and some such.
But
The character walks on the very edge of a dune and only leaves footsteps in the sand. Theres a gigantic flash causing lens artefact, but somehow not bright enough to illuminate shadows cast from the other side. The other, main light source makes a day there, but u can see stars in the sky. Its a painting, but u felt the need to include this horrible digital artefact of a camera. U r greatly equipped to NOT DRAW THE ERROR OF THE MEDIUM and any1 who likes lens flares is an idiot.
Giand piece of technology, with a large bit broken off, didnt just snap and fell and its not cuz the gravity is low, cuz footprints show the length of a step.
And theres this giant halo, that goes in front and behind the structure, but what is it? Its not a lens flare, cuz its not circular on the image - its elliptic. And its uniform - the same thickness of a line on the entire picture, so its not a structure within the world.
It sticks to your style, so i take it u dont want to experiment, but then again, theres only so far u can go outside of being u with your muscle practice and such. I dont know how much u can do to make your pictures not look like color pencil drawing.
For any1, who sees such details, it can be distracting to enjoy the piece
at step 2 uve done sth to her mouth, that made her change her expression from "resting" to "ewww, im tying up my hair".
There seems to be blue light reflecting off of her abdomen, but not face or chest. Theres is a glow on the edge of her profile, but that seems not right, if lower torso is lit up so widely. U shouldve stuck with light from behind, or have this in mind next time.
Her right hand seems weird too. I get its not an attempt at a masterpiece, but she holds her hair tight with index finger and a thumb, has middle and ring finger curled up, but pinky clenched down?
Everything else is fine
Of course it catches the eye - after all, it moves. But the move makes it seem like the pose changes a little. Surely its cuz of the way its animated - its transitional from 1 version to another; what was before turns into whats later. However it looks like it drags the lines and shifts position.
Detail is fine, its shaded reailstically and convincingly, dynamic pose and such. The continuous changing makes it harder to focus on details, though. And yet the chestplates seem off - the perspective isnt quite right. Its extra visible on the circle in the middle.
As we know, fasion requires sacrifices - u cant put your arms up, when wearing formal jackets. But shes wearing a tank top, some ribcage, open jacket and no gloves. In a blizzard. AND shes a woman, and as we know, air conditioning is sexist, meaning shes less tolerant to suboptimal temperatures. Shes dead and she hates it. Miss badass didnt think that through.
The green lightning is a nice detail.

deviantID

Petardawnabial
Dante
Vatican City

Journal

No journal entries yet.

Comments


Add a Comment:
 
Flagged as Spam
:iconpetardawnabial:
Petardawnabial Featured By Owner Mar 3, 2017
ladies 1st, faggot
Reply
Flagged as Spam
:iconpetardawnabial:
Petardawnabial Featured By Owner Mar 4, 2017
what a pathetic come-back, girl. No wonder nobody loves u.
pathetic edgelord faggot. "Look at me, ive got hitler im ny avatar - u can tell how much dick i suck"
Reply
:iconstormfeatherarts:
StormfeatherARTS Featured By Owner Dec 26, 2016  Student Digital Artist
There really is something wrong with you. I'm not religious. I don't believe in god or Jesus or anything. But at least I don't go around trying to hurt and upset people. Most of my friends are religious. Do I give a shit? Do I hurt and upset them? No. And that's the reason why (unlike you) I have friends. You can throw insults and excuses at me, but I'll only take it as a sign of weakness. If you want a life one day, you'll have to earn it. And trying to be superior is not the way to do so. Especially in such a hurtful manner. Have a nice day.
Reply
:iconpetardawnabial:
Petardawnabial Featured By Owner Dec 27, 2016
my friends r better than yours, cuz they r not religious.
Go fuck yourself
Reply
:iconstormfeatherarts:
StormfeatherARTS Featured By Owner Dec 27, 2016  Student Digital Artist
I don't believe that.
Reply
:iconpetardawnabial:
Petardawnabial Featured By Owner Dec 28, 2016
and yet reality refused to bend to your beliefs
Reply
(1 Reply)
Add a Comment: